Ennerdale  Lordship Former Crown Manor - Feudal Barony of Copeland in Cumbria
© Former Crown Manor of Ennerdale - Feudal Barony of Copeland 2020-24

Ennerdale Terms

Ennerdale Forest - Valleys, Lakes, Mountains , Rivers, Streams, etc.

Legal Terms and Disclaimer

This website implies rights to honors, hereditments, intangibles and historical rights to related property around the world. This site uses photos and likenesses of owners or rights holders. The website hasrights to use place names, ancient territory names, rights to light, franchises, heretiments, land related intangible rights, images, copyrights, This site is subject to the venue and jurisdiction of USA Colorado Federal Courts. The lords and ladys of this seignory or territory may be several people including primary beneficiary, secondary beneficiary and contingent beneficiaries. Expenses of this research, seignory, property rights, marketing, branding, advertising, products, services, and other necessary travel or publications are part of the company activities including the activities of honors holders: 1) Lady of Ennerdale 2) Dame of Fief Blondel 3) Baroness of Longford and 4) Lady and Lord of Stoborough Any unclaimed or non-specified right is claimed herein to: Advowson or Patronage to existing or former churches, priories, abbeys or cathedrals, any rights to tithes, any rights to common, any rights to foreshore on rivers and beaches, or lakes, rights to commons of fishing and hunting, rights to commons of minerals, water, or elements, rights to estover and wood, rigts of ways and servitudes, Offices, which are a right to exercise a public or private employment, and to the fees and emoluments thereunto belonging, are also incorporeal hereditaments: whether public, as those of magistrates; or private, as of bailiffs, receivers, and the like, Dignities, rights to Franchises, liberties, palatines, court leets, holding pleas, markets and fairs, forests, chases, Free-warren, river water, lake water, ocean water, rocks reifs, ocean islands, inland islands, bays, waterways, boating and water rights, rights to treasure, rights to mineral rights, landscape pictures, satellite images, Annuities, rents, or any honor dignity or title related to former grants in relation to the lands or territories. Anyone on the Ennerdale Manor property is hereby notified that they may be trespassing on private lands and assume the risk of any injury or harm. Forum, venue and Jurisdiction subject to the USA Federal Courts Colorado USA Overview of the manorial rights of lords of the manor 1. Economic Rights: Rent Collection: The lord had the right to collect rent from the tenants who lived on the manor's land. This rent could be in the form of goods, services, or agricultural produce. 2. Judicial Rights: Court Jurisdiction: The lord held jurisdiction over a manorial court, where they could hear cases related to disputes among tenants, criminal matters, and civil issues within the manor. Punishment: The lord could impose punishments and fines for various offenses committed by the tenants. 3. Land and Resource Management: Enclosure Rights: The lord could enclose common lands, forests, or open spaces for private use, which often limited access for tenants. Hunting and Fishing Rights: The lord held exclusive rights to hunting game animals and fishing in certain water bodies within the manor. Common Land Rights: Tenants had rights to use specific areas of land for common purposes such as grazing livestock and gathering firewood. 4. Water Rights: Riparian Rights: The lord had rights to access and use water resources, particularly if the manor was adjacent to a river or other water bodies. This included rights to water for irrigation and other purposes. 5. Foreshore Rights: Foreshore Rights: If the manor was located along a coastline or water body, the lord might have rights to the foreshore, which is the area between low and high tide. This could involve control over access, fishing, and other activities on the foreshore. 6. Ecclesiastical Rights: Advowson: The lord could have the right to appoint a local priest to a church within the manor. Tithes: The lord might receive a portion of the agricultural produce (tithes) produced by the tenants for the support of the local church. 7. Feudal Services: Labor Services: Tenants were often required to provide labor services to the lord, such as working on the lord's land or participating in military campaigns when called upon. Knight Service: In exchange for land, tenants might be obligated to provide military service as knights to the lord in times of conflict. Manorial Waste - 11,000 Acres in Cumbria UK The concept of manorial waste refers to land within a manor that remained in its natural state and was not specifically owned or used by any individual. This land could include various types of terrain such as moorland, fells, mountains, or marshes. Despite being part of the manor, these areas were not enclosed or cultivated for agricultural or residential purposes. The Statute of Merton, enacted in 1236 in England, addressed the issue of land ownership within manors, including the regulation of manorial waste. According to this statute, ownership of such waste lands within a manor was granted to the lord of the manor. This meant that the lord had control over these unenclosed areas and could potentially exploit them for various purposes, such as hunting, grazing, or resource extraction. In essence, the Statute of Merton formalized the lord's rights to the unappropriated lands within the manor, giving them legal authority over what was previously considered communal or unused land. This consolidation of control played a significant role in the medieval feudal system, reinforcing the power and authority of the lord over his domain. In medieval England, common land typically referred to areas that were collectively used by the inhabitants of a village or community for activities such as grazing animals, collecting firewood, or foraging. Manorial waste, on the other hand, referred to land within the manor that remained uncultivated and unenclosed, often consisting of moorland, fells, mountains, or marshes. The Statute of Merton primarily addressed the rights of the lord of the manor over all such lands. It vested ownership of these lands in the lord, allowing them to exercise control and potentially exploit them for various purposes. One significant legal case that helped clarify the distinction between common land and manorial waste is the case of "Rex v. Inhabitants of Sedgmoor" in 1803. This case dealt with a dispute over the ownership and usage of certain lands in the parish of Sedgmoor in Somerset, England. The case involved conflicting claims between the lord of the manor and the local inhabitants over rights to common land and manorial waste. In this case, the court clarified that common land was land traditionally used and enjoyed by the local community for activities such as grazing animals, gathering firewood, or foraging. Common land was typically subject to customary rights held by the villagers, and these rights were often well-established through long-standing tradition. On the other hand, manorial waste was understood to be land within the manor that remained uncultivated and unenclosed, often consisting of rough or barren terrain such as moorland, marshes, or wasteland. Manorial waste was generally considered to be under the ownership and control of the lord of the manor, who had the right to manage and exploit it as they saw fit. The court's decision in the "Rex v. Inhabitants of Sedgmoor" case helped to clarify the legal distinction between common land and manorial waste, providing guidance for future disputes over land usage and ownership rights. Another notable legal case is "Ackroyd v. Smithson" in 1891. This case dealt with a dispute over rights to common land and waste land in the parish of Wilsden in Yorkshire, England. The court's decision in this case reaffirmed the traditional understanding of common land as land subject to customary rights held by the local community. In "Ackroyd v. Smithson," the court emphasized the importance of historical usage and customary rights in determining ownership and usage rights to common land. The case highlighted the need to respect the long-standing rights and interests of the local inhabitants when adjudicating disputes over common land and waste land. These legal cases, among others, helped to clarify the legal distinctions between common land and manorial waste, providing guidance for future disputes and contributing to the development of land law in England. The designation of "manorial waste" is a legal term that historically pertained to land within a manor that remained unappropriated to any individual. The Vast parts of the Lake District's uplands have been considered waste land in historical legal contexts for over 1000 years. Manorial waste refers to land within a manor that remained in its natural state, often consisting of rough or barren terrain such as moorland, fells, mountains, or marshes, and was not specifically allocated to any individual tenant. This land was typically unenclosed and unutilized for agricultural or residential purposes. Instead, it was often available for common usage, such as for grazing animals, gathering firewood, or foraging, by the local community. Ownership of manorial waste was vested in the lord of the manor, who had the right to manage and potentially exploit it for various purposes. In Cumbria's Lake District, the concept of manorial waste would have been historically relevant, given the region's history of manorial estates and agricultural practices. The Lake District's rugged terrain, including its upland fells and mountains, would likely have included areas classified as manorial waste. However, it's important to note that the Lake District has also been inhabited and utilized by communities for centuries, with people living in and around the area engaging in agriculture, grazing, and other activities. The recognition of manorial waste as a right of lords in Cumbria's Lake District has been established within the broad legal framework of English land law and feudalism. This recognition likely dates back many centuries, to the medieval period and possibly even earlier, when manorial estates were established and the rights and responsibilities of lords and tenants were defined. The Common lands are quite separate from the 11,000 acres of Manorial Waste. The Free Barony of Ennerdale Ennerdale is unique in that it was a former Scotish lands that became a Crown Manor that was sold outright “direct from the King” to the noble family of the Lowthers and is a True Free-Lord Domain or Free-Baron as they say in Europe. The term "manorial waste" generally refers to land within a medieval manor estate that was considered unproductive or unused. Different types of land could be classified as manorial waste based on their characteristics and suitability for cultivation or other productive activities. Here are some common types of manorial waste: 1. Woodlands: Areas of forest or woodland that were not actively managed or cultivated for timber production. These woodlands might have been used for hunting, foraging, or gathering wood, but they were not typically subjected to intensive logging or management. 2. Marshes and Wetlands: Low-lying areas prone to flooding or waterlogging, such as marshes, swamps, or bogs. These areas were often unsuitable for cultivation or settlement but might have been used for grazing livestock, gathering reeds or rushes, or hunting waterfowl. 3. Barren or Rocky Terrain: Areas with rocky or infertile soil that made them unsuitable for agriculture. This could include rocky outcrops, moorland, or barren hillsides (fells). While these areas might have supported some limited grazing or foraging, they were generally considered unproductive. 4. Common Land: Portions of the manor that were held in common by the residents of the manor or neighboring communities. Common land could include various types of terrain, such as pastures, meadows, or waste areas, and it was typically used for activities like grazing livestock, gathering firewood, or collecting wild plants. 5. Roads, Paths, and Tracks: Rights of way and thoroughfares that traversed the manor, providing access to different parts of the estate or connecting it with neighboring areas. While not strictly "waste" in the sense of being unused land, roads and paths were often considered part of the manorial waste due to their limited agricultural value. 6. Unused or Abandoned Settlements: Areas where buildings or structures had fallen into disuse or disrepair, such as abandoned villages or farmsteads. These areas might have been left vacant due to depopulation, changes in land use, or other factors, rendering them part of the manorial waste. These are just a few examples of the types of land that could be classified as manorial waste within a medieval manor estate. The specific classification of land as manorial waste would depend on factors such as local customs, geography, and the prevailing economic and social conditions of the time.
© Former Crown Manor of Ennerdale Feudal Barony of Copeland

Ennerdale Terms

Ennerdale Forest - Valleys, Lakes,

Mountains , Rivers, Streams, etc.

This website implies rights to honors, hereditments, intangibles and historical rights to related property around the world. This site uses photos and likenesses of owners or rights holders. The website hasrights to use place names, ancient territory names, rights to light, franchises, heretiments, land related intangible rights, images, copyrights, This site is subject to the venue and jurisdiction of USA Colorado Federal Courts. The lords and ladys of this seignory or territory may be several people including primary beneficiary, secondary beneficiary and contingent beneficiaries. Expenses of this research, seignory, property rights, marketing, branding, advertising, products, services, and other necessary travel or publications are part of the company activities including the activities of honors holders: 1) Lady of Ennerdale 2) Dame of Fief Blondel 3) Baroness of Longford and 4) Lady and Lord of Stoborough 5) Baron of Couplandia Any unclaimed right is claimed herein to: Advowson or Patronage to existing or former churches, priories, abbeys or cathedrals, any rights to tithes, any rights to common, any rights to foreshore on rivers and beaches, or lakes, rights to commons of fishing and hunting, rights to commons of minerals, water, or elements, rights to estover and wood, rigts of ways and servitudes, Offices, which are a right to exercise a public or private employment, and to the fees and emoluments thereunto belonging, are also incorporeal hereditaments: whether public, as those of magistrates; or private, as of bailiffs, receivers, and the like, Dignities, rights to Franchises, liberties, palatines, court leets, holding pleas, markets and fairs, forests, chases, Free-warren, river water, lake water, ocean water, rocks reifs, ocean islands, inland islands, bays, waterways, boating and water rights, rights to treasure, rights to mineral rights, landscape pictures, satellite images, Annuities, rents, or any honor dignity or title related to former grants in relation to the lands or territories. Forum, venue and Jurisdiction subject to the USA Federal Courts Colorado USA Manorial Waste - 11,000 Acres in Cumbria UK The concept of manorial waste refers to land within a manor that remained in its natural state and was not specifically owned or used by any individual. This land could include various types of terrain such as moorland, fells, mountains, or marshes. Despite being part of the manor, these areas were not enclosed or cultivated for agricultural or residential purposes. The Statute of Merton, enacted in 1236 in England, addressed the issue of land ownership within manors, including the regulation of manorial waste. According to this statute, ownership of such waste lands within a manor was granted to the lord of the manor. This meant that the lord had control over these unenclosed areas and could potentially exploit them for various purposes, such as hunting, grazing, or resource extraction. In essence, the Statute of Merton formalized the lord's rights to the unappropriated lands within the manor, giving them legal authority over what was previously considered communal or unused land. This consolidation of control played a significant role in the medieval feudal system, reinforcing the power and authority of the lord over his domain. In medieval England, common land typically referred to areas that were collectively used by the inhabitants of a village or community for activities such as grazing animals, collecting firewood, or foraging. Manorial waste, on the other hand, referred to land within the manor that remained uncultivated and unenclosed, often consisting of moorland, fells, mountains, or marshes. The Statute of Merton primarily addressed the rights of the lord of the manor over all such lands. It vested ownership of these lands in the lord, allowing them to exercise control and potentially exploit them for various purposes. One significant legal case that helped clarify the distinction between common land and manorial waste is the case of "Rex v. Inhabitants of Sedgmoor" in 1803. This case dealt with a dispute over the ownership and usage of certain lands in the parish of Sedgmoor in Somerset, England. The case involved conflicting claims between the lord of the manor and the local inhabitants over rights to common land and manorial waste. In this case, the court clarified that common land was land traditionally used and enjoyed by the local community for activities such as grazing animals, gathering firewood, or foraging. Common land was typically subject to customary rights held by the villagers, and these rights were often well- established through long-standing tradition. On the other hand, manorial waste was understood to be land within the manor that remained uncultivated and unenclosed, often consisting of rough or barren terrain such as moorland, marshes, or wasteland. Manorial waste was generally considered to be under the ownership and control of the lord of the manor, who had the right to manage and exploit it as they saw fit. The court's decision in the "Rex v. Inhabitants of Sedgmoor" case helped to clarify the legal distinction between common land and manorial waste, providing guidance for future disputes over land usage and ownership rights. Another notable legal case is "Ackroyd v. Smithson" in 1891. This case dealt with a dispute over rights to common land and waste land in the parish of Wilsden in Yorkshire, England. The court's decision in this case reaffirmed the traditional understanding of common land as land subject to customary rights held by the local community. In "Ackroyd v. Smithson," the court emphasized the importance of historical usage and customary rights in determining ownership and usage rights to common land. The case highlighted the need to respect the long-standing rights and interests of the local inhabitants when adjudicating disputes over common land and waste land. These legal cases, among others, helped to clarify the legal distinctions between common land and manorial waste, providing guidance for future disputes and contributing to the development of land law in England. The designation of "manorial waste" is a legal term that historically pertained to land within a manor that remained unappropriated to any individual. The Vast parts of the Lake District's uplands have been considered waste land in historical legal contexts for over 1000 years. Manorial waste refers to land within a manor that remained in its natural state, often consisting of rough or barren terrain such as moorland, fells, mountains, or marshes, and was not specifically allocated to any individual tenant. This land was typically unenclosed and unutilized for agricultural or residential purposes. Instead, it was often available for common usage, such as for grazing animals, gathering firewood, or foraging, by the local community. Ownership of manorial waste was vested in the lord of the manor, who had the right to manage and potentially exploit it for various purposes. In Cumbria's Lake District, the concept of manorial waste would have been historically relevant, given the region's history of manorial estates and agricultural practices. The Lake District's rugged terrain, including its upland fells and mountains, would likely have included areas classified as manorial waste. However, it's important to note that the Lake District has also been inhabited and utilized by communities for centuries, with people living in and around the area engaging in agriculture, grazing, and other activities. The recognition of manorial waste as a right of lords in Cumbria's Lake District has been established within the broad legal framework of English land law and feudalism. This recognition likely dates back many centuries, to the medieval period and possibly even earlier, when manorial estates were established and the rights and responsibilities of lords and tenants were defined. The Common lands are quite separate from the 11,000 acres of Manorial Waste. The Free Barony of Ennerdale Ennerdale is unique in that it was a former Scotish lands that became a Crown Manor that was sold outright “direct from the King” to the noble family of the Lowthers and is a True Free-Lord Domain or Free-Baron as they say in Europe. The term "manorial waste" generally refers to land within a medieval manor estate that was considered unproductive or unused. Different types of land could be classified as manorial waste based on their characteristics and suitability for cultivation or other productive activities. Here are some common types of manorial waste: 1. Woodlands: Areas of forest or woodland that were not actively managed or cultivated for timber production. These woodlands might have been used for hunting, foraging, or gathering wood, but they were not typically subjected to intensive logging or management. 2. Marshes and Wetlands: Low-lying areas prone to flooding or waterlogging, such as marshes, swamps, or bogs. These areas were often unsuitable for cultivation or settlement but might have been used for grazing livestock, gathering reeds or rushes, or hunting waterfowl. 3. Barren or Rocky Terrain: Areas with rocky or infertile soil that made them unsuitable for agriculture. This could include rocky outcrops, moorland, or barren hillsides (fells). While these areas might have supported some limited grazing or foraging, they were generally considered unproductive. 4. Common Land: Portions of the manor that were held in common by the residents of the manor or neighboring communities. Common land could include various types of terrain, such as pastures, meadows, or waste areas, and it was typically used for activities like grazing livestock, gathering firewood, or collecting wild plants. 5. Roads, Paths, and Tracks: Rights of way and thoroughfares that traversed the manor, providing access to different parts of the estate or connecting it with neighboring areas. While not strictly "waste" in the sense of being unused land, roads and paths were often considered part of the manorial waste due to their limited agricultural value. 6. Unused or Abandoned Settlements: Areas where buildings or structures had fallen into disuse or disrepair, such as abandoned villages or farmsteads. These areas might have been left vacant due to depopulation, changes in land use, or other factors, rendering them part of the manorial waste. These are just a few examples of the types of land that could be classified as manorial waste within a medieval manor estate. The specific classification of land as manorial waste would depend on factors such as local customs, geography, and the prevailing economic and social conditions of the time.